Some questions for Justice Lahoti
Justice
Lahoti, the former Chief Justice of India, when contacted by some media
people about my statement which was published on my blog and in Times
of India yesterday, generally remarked that he has never done anything
wrong in his life. He has not gone into any specifics, so let me put him
some specific questions :
1. Is it , or is it not, correct that I first wrote
him a letter from Chennai, stating that there were serious allegations
of corruption about an Additional Judge of Madras High Court, and
therefore he ( Justice Lahoti ) should get a secret intelligence enquiry
held against that Additional Judge,and thereafter I personally met
Justice Lahoti at Delhi and again requested for a secret IB enquiry
against the Additional Judge about whom I had received several
complaints, and from several sources, that he was indulging in
corruption ?
2. Is it, or is it not, correct that on my request Justice Lahoti ordered a secret IB enquiry against that Judge ?
3. Is it, or is it not correct, that a few weeks after I personally met
him in Delhi and then returned to Chennai, he telephoned me from Delhi (
while I was at Chennai ) and told me that the IB, after thorough
enquiry, gave a report that indeed the Judge was indulging in corruption
?
4. Is it , or is it not, correct that after receiving the adverse IB
report against the Additional Judge, Justice Lahoti, who was then Chief
Justice of India, called a meeting of the 3 Judge Supreme Court
Collegium, consisting of himself, Justice Sabarwal, and Justice Ruma
Pal, and the 3 Judge Collegium, having perused the IB report recommended
to the Government of India not to extend the 2 year term of that
Additional Judge ?
5. Is it , or is it not, correct that after that recommendation of the 3
Judge Collegium of the Supreme Court was sent to the Government of
India, he ( Justice Lahoti ), on his own, without consulting his 2 other
Supreme Court Collegium colleagues, wrote a letter to the Government of
India asking the Government to give another 1 year term as Additional
Judge to the concerned Judge ?
6. If indeed the IB reported, after an enquiry, that the Judge was
indulging in corruption, why did he ( Justice Lahoti ) recommend to the
Government of India to give that corrupt Judge another term of 1 year as
Additional Judge in the High Court ?
Some people have commented about the timing of my statement. What
happened was that some Tamilians had commented on Facebook that I am
posting several matters on my Facebook post, so I should also post some
of my experiences in Madras High Court. Then I started posting about my
experiences there, and it was at time I remembered this experience too,
and posted it.
No comments:
Post a Comment